PCR tests
PCR: POSITIVE COUNT RISING (June '21)
Some days I just wish to be among the ignorant ones... Latest news after medical analysis: PCR tests turn out to be a tool of genocide (26/4-21) — Dernières nouvelles après analyse médicale: les tests PCR s’avèrent être un outil de génocide (29/4-21):
File: Analysis of test sticks from surface testing in the Slovak Republic - confirmation of genocide.
Stop COVID Testing Immediately: PCR and Quick Test Swabs May be Cancer-Causing (29/3-21): Not only has covid testing become a US$ 100 billion business, it is also potentially a “deadly business”. PCR and Quick Test swabs are sterilized with the carcinogen Ethylene Oxide.
According to the Government of Canada, as well as the “What do They Know” the PCR test swabs are sterilized by ethylene oxide which is described by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a carcinogen. In other words, a potentially cancer-causing chemical toxin.
The PCR Test does not Identify the Virus: Covid “False Positives” Used to Justify the Lockdown and Closure of the National Economy (4/2-21): We are led to believe that the corona epidemic has entered into a Second Wave, and that the virus is spreading relentlessly. That’s a lie.
The PCR test used to estimate covid positive cases is flawed. There is no second wave.
The test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to justifying the lockdown with devastating social and economic consequences including the engineered bankruptcy of the urban services economy, tourism and air travel.
Confirmed by prominent scientists as well as by official public health bodies including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Covid-19 is a public health concern but it is NOT a dangerous virus.
The unspoken truth is that the novel coronavirus provides a pretext and a justification to powerful financial interests and corrupt politicians to precipitate the entire World into a spiral of mass unemployment, bankruptcy, extreme poverty and despair.
More than 7 billion people Worldwide are directly or indirectly affected by the corona crisis.
We are in the middle of an information war (3/2-21): Interview with 3D artist, hacktivist, bioinformatician and “Drosten whistleblower” Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Bobby’s world consists of blockchains, 3D programs and 3D protein graphics reminiscent of space landscapes or psychedelic art. Until the end of 2020, he worked as a 3D illustrator at a molecular medicine research center and was part of the SARS-CoV2 task force there. His task in the spring of 2020 was to illustrate the spike protein of the coronavirus. When he began to have doubts about the scientific process on which the corona PCR test is also based, he dove deeper into the inconsistencies surrounding the Corman-Drosten paper. Today, he is a co-author of the report calling for the paper’s retraction. Bobby talks to me about the Drosten scandal, the power of critical mass, and the “fine art of trolling.”
PCR test upgrade!!! Anal Swab Covid-19 Test Presentation (01/02-21): China introduced the new testing method, which involves inserting a swab 1.2-2 inches into the rectum, and the authorities say it can detect the virus more accurately than oral or nasal methods. They added the technique is used only in high-risk cases. According to Chinese State TV, anal swabs won't be used as widely because the method isn't as "convenient".
After anal swab Covid-19 test: Chinese authorities were on Monday (1 Feb.) compelled to assure the public that they won't waddle like penguins following the anal swab coronavirus test. The clarification from the state came after a video purportedly showing people walking awkwardly following their COVID tests went viral. The video, which had already been viewed millions of times, was declared "fake" and taken down.
One of the articles covering this “anal” story…
Has your mental health, your physical health, your financial health, your local community that sustains you ... been ravaged by inappropriate and unscientific use of PCR testing? Well, Brits, here's a place to fight back: PCR Claims
WHO Finally Admits COVID-19 PCR Test Has a ‘Problem’ (21/1-21): The WHO’s new guidance, which includes lower PCR thresholds, almost guarantees COVID “case” numbers will automatically drop dramatically around the world.
WHO finally admits that PCR tests are unreliable: The World Health Organization has finally admitted in a memo WHO Information Notice for IVD Users from December 14, that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests for Sars-Cov-2 will result in false positives. The question is: Why now?!? and Why only now?
XI's PCR Tests Protocol (18/1-21): “Corman & Drosten’s PCR protocol has every indication of being fraudulent.”
As if it weren’t enough that these PCR tests are pointless: Medical associations warn of injuries caused by swabs from the nasopharynx — The Austrian medical chambers of Styria and Vienna have warned of injuries that can result from a swab from the nasopharynx. There have already been reports of skull base perforations and liquor fistulas. Perforation is the term used to describe a piercing or piercing of the tissue.
Interview with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (25/12 for Planet Lockdown), a German American lawyer with experience going after large companies like Deutsche Bank. He is a member of the German Corona Investigative Committee. He discusses the current situation and his efforts to bring justice to the situation. (with Spanish subtitles)
The Scam Has Been Confirmed: PCR Does Not Detect SARS-CoV-2: «The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed "genome" and even the so-called "target genes" allegedly specific to the "new coronavirus". The test is worthless and all "positive" results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world's leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!»
Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany. False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test: «The widely-praised German model of the Angela Merkel regime to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic is now engulfed in a series of potentially devastating scandals going to the very heart of the testing and medical advice being used to declare draconian economic shutdowns and next, de facto mandatory vaccinations. The scandals involve a professor at the heart of Merkel’s corona advisory group. The implications go far beyond German borders to the very WHO itself and their global recommendations.» (povzetek v slovenščini je povsem spodaj)
New details in covid testing scandal: New details have emerged about the test used for Covid-19, highlighting serious inaccuracies in results and past comments by the tests’ creator doubting the accuracy of PCR testing.
The reason behind this year's clusterfuck: Corman-Drosten publication, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus by real-time RT-PCR”. And the bomb of the year: The external peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals its 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
"This paper shows numerous serious flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19. We are confronted with stringent lockdowns which have destroyed many people’s lives and livelihoods, limited access to education and these imposed restrictions by governments around the world are a direct attack on people’s basic rights and their personal freedoms, resulting in collateral damage for entire economies on a global scale."
Dr Michael Yeadon: Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives:
«It's about the testing we do with something called PCR, an amplification technique, better known to biologists as a research tool used in our labs, when trying to unpick mechanisms of disease. I was frankly astonished to realise they’re sometimes used in population screening for diseases – astonished because it is a very exacting technique, prone to invisible errors and it’s quite a tall order to get reliable information out of it, especially because of the prodigious amounts of amplification involved in attempting to pick up a strand of viral genetic code. The test cannot distinguish between a living virus and a short strand of RNA from a virus which broke into pieces weeks or months ago.»
Very interesting. If you wish to know even more about these PCR tests upon which they've decided to lock us in, isolate ... and caused an unmeasurable clusterfuck: Molecular biologist Peter Borger meticulously testified for over eight hours on November 21, 2020 about the "Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction" test. He explains in plain Dutch very precisely how this test was designed in part by people from the Dutch CDC (RIVM) and why this test does not do what it is being used for. (with English subtitles) Many more testimonies are available on the site of Buiten Parlementaire Onderzoeks Commissie 2020 (BPOC 2020)
Microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: “Trash the PCR test”
Covid-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless: Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose
Growing research indicates many COVID-19 cases might not be infectious at all. Elevated 'cycle thresholds' may be detecting virus long after it is past the point of infection.
Useless testing: Contrary to the assurances of medical establishment and politicians, PCR tests are not suitable for diagnosing an alleged “SARS-CoV-2 infection”.
Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? — The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus
“Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.” –Kary Mullis, Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction
Corona: creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic tests:
«Nailed them, with their own words. In this article, I’ll present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus. I’m talking about fatal flaws in the test. Because case numbers are based on those tests (or no tests at all), the whole “pandemic effect” has been created out of fake science.»
Are you infectious if you have a positive PCR test result for COVID-19?
Asymptomatic 'Casedemic' Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear: As coronavirus testing takes place en masse across the U.S., many are questioning whether the tests are accurate enough to trust, especially in people who are asymptomatic. Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have several drawbacks that make mass testing problematic and rife for misleading fearmongering.
Covid Testing Fraud Uncovered: As cases of coronavirus rise across America, shouldn’t death rates be going up too? Del breaks down how covid tests may be seriously flawed by providing less than accurate results and why the majority of positive cases could be false.
The Infectious Myth, a book project by David Crowe, will unfortunately never be published as this versatile and curious mind passed away in July 2020, but his paper Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory by David Crowe explains a lot.
The Incredible and Scary Truth about COVID-19 Tests: A lot depends on the result of your COVID-19 test, whether it is positive, indicating infection or, big sigh of relief, negative, indicating that you are not infected. But is there such a thing as “the” COVID-19 test? Indeed there is not. There are many and each is looking for different things and making different decisions about whether those things are present or not.
The Trouble With PCR Tests by Swiss Policy Research (Oct. 2020)
Konflikti interesov za PCR testi, od Nemčije do WHO-ja: «Nemčijo pretresava “serija potencialno uničujočih škandalov, ki direktno izpodbijajo PCR teste in medicinski odgovor na razglašeno epidemijo; torej bistvena predpogoja za razglasitev ekonomsko drakonskih zaprtij in, v naslednji fazi, obveznega cepljenja. Vpleten je tudi eden izmed ključnih svetovalcev v državni svetovalni skupini. Obtožbe gredo daleč preko nemških meja, direktno do WHO (Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije) in njenih priporočil na globalni ravni.”
Interesting article from Oxford's Clinical Infectious Diseases: Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates
An old but very interesting article from Oxford's Clinical Infectious Diseases: Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples: “SARS-CoV-2 Vero cell infectivity was only observed for RT-PCR Ct < 24 and STT < 8 days. Infectivity of patients with Ct > 24 and duration of symptoms > 8 days may be low. This information can inform public health policy and guide clinical, infection control, and occupational health decisions. Further studies of larger size are needed.”
